Hi, Whats your ID on English Wikipedia? I would appreciate, I think we both could be very helpful for each other.

--Urdu-Writer 10:21, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC)

  • It means that "That article was nominated for Deletion because according to biased administrators of Wikipedia, this article is USELESS".

--iamsaa 11:41, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha. This person is the crown prince of Iran. He has articles in more than 20 languages of wikipedia. He must be kidding, on what base he is nominating it for deletation. He must have a reason though! --Kaaveh Ahangar 11:45, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC),

  • You might be surprized to note that but in Urdu Wikipedia the administrators don't abide the rules & regulations of Wikipedia, they have their own self-made policies and they strictly follow them. If you spend some of your time on

urdu wikipedia, you will realize it yourself. I have translated an article from English Wikipedia but they have protected that article and now they are adding unsourced and biased information just because its contrary to their faith and belief. You know that article is available on 12 different languages on Wikipedia.

--iamsaa 12:03, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC)

That's a shame, I will definatly discuss this issue with Jimbo and other stewards at the up-coming wikimania convention. At the same time can you add some details to Prince Reza Pahlavi's article, just to prevent them from questioning his notability. Best Regards --Kaaveh Ahangar 12:15, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dear Kaaveh, the fact is that your article that is nominated for deletion is not making a proper Urdu sentence, if you are interested in writing an article on pehlvi you can make a request on the community portal or at any talke page and someone will write the article for you. As for Iamsaa's comments, the pointed article was about a false mehdi and prophet named Gohar Shahi and if you want to know the facts about this person, Please read this ONLINE ARTICLE. You can also read the Fatawa of Sunni Ulama-e-deen as well as Shia Ulama-e-deen online, and see yourself, and here is another prominent site of muslim Ulama-e-deen. Smarqandi.
  • I would rather suggest you to kindly read the English version of this article and you will realize the fact. The fact is that these administrators are neither SINCERE and nor serving the true aim of Wikipedia. They have used discussion of different people (BLOGS) as references and they have refused to accept 21 references presented in favor of the article. I can furnish you with detailed information on this. Moreover, being the administrator, they should try to improve and construct articles instead of nominating articles for deletion even for small mistake of a sentence. Moreover, the excuse that Samaqundi gave was also false as it was mentioned in reason for deletion that this article of Pehalvi is USELESS.

--iamsaa 12:27, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC)

Hahaaha, You see that now he (Samarqundi, the most biased one) is trying to show efficiency by correcting the spelling mistakes of the article of Pehalvi. These are the people who have their own aims and objectives on Wikipedia and they want to run wikipedia as their personal portal. Even, just now he has created a new category for Pehalvi Family.

--iamsaa 12:52, 7 مئی 2008 (UTC)

You are always welcome : - ) If you need to make any page of any article of your interest, just let me know the English wikipedia link of that article and I will try to write a short introduction of that article in Urdu wikipedia, as soon as I got time to do so. Samarqandi

Why not! soon you'll see article on Borj-e-Milad. Fkehar

Thanks a lot. --Kaaveh Ahangar 22:51, 10 مئی 2008 (UTC)

برج میلاد Translated article about Borj-e-Milad is here فہد احمد کیہر تبادلۂ خیال | میرا حصہ

Your account will be renamed ترمیم

08:43, 20 مارچ 2015 (م ع و)

12:58, 19 اپریل 2015 (م ع و)