"تبادلۂ خیال:مراقبہ" کے نسخوں کے درمیان فرق

حذف شدہ مندرجات اضافہ شدہ مندرجات
کوئی خلاصۂ ترمیم نہیں
مکوئی خلاصۂ ترمیم نہیں
سطر 5:
 
* The actual situation is opposite what you claim brother, this article is not a sufficient article on مراقبہ and it has nothing to do with the actual depth of the matter it is talking about. I am sure you will be agree with the fact that; publication in a PAKISTAN largest newspaper can not be a criteria for an article to judge its actual literal value. The article creates more questions in mind than it gives answers. This may be a very good article on the non-professional grounds and easy to read for a common person who just interested to read about مراقبہ as a general knowledge, but it is not at the standard of an encyclopedia. --[[صارف:سمرقندی|سمرقندی]] 05:48, 23 اپريل 2009 (UTC)
 
 
This notion is extremely amazing for me to stop productive/ innovative work under historical ancient approaches, where criterion are fixed under books as well as quoted ear. I feel that my creative work is not fit here; I have to stop further work. I regret to say that I have deleted all this work for your convince.
Muhmmad Altaf Gohar
واپس "مراقبہ" پر