نوبل انعام یافتہ لامذہب شخصیات کی فہرست

مندرجہ ذیل فہرست میں نوبل انعام یافتہ لامذہب شخصیات کی فہرست دی گئی ہے۔ مالالہ یوسف زاءی

کیمیا

ترمیم

معاشیات

ترمیم

طبیعیات

ترمیم

طب و فعلیات

ترمیم

مزید دیکھیے

ترمیم

حوالہ جات

ترمیم
  1. Gordon Stein، مدیر (1985)۔ The Encyclopedia of unbelief (Nachdr. ایڈیشن)۔ Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books۔ ج 1۔ ص 594۔ ISBN:978-0-87975-307-8۔ Svante Arrhenius (I859-I927)، recipient of the Nobel Prize in chemistry (I903)، was a declared atheist.۔۔
  2. Boyer, Paul D. (مارچ 2004)، "A Path to Atheism"، Freethought Today، Freedom From Religion Foundation، ج 21 شمارہ 2، اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2010-03-16۔[مردہ ربط]
  3. Francis Perrin (2008)۔ "Joliot, Frédéric"۔ Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography۔ Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons۔ ج 7۔ ص 151۔ Raised in a completely nonreligious family, Joliot never attended any church and was a thoroughgoing atheist all his life.
  4. Francis Perrin (2008)۔ "Joliot-Curie, Irène"۔ Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography۔ Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons۔ ج 7۔ ص 157۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-16۔ It was to her grandfather, a convinced freethinker, that Irène owed her atheism, later politically expressed as anticlericalism.
  5. "50 Renowned Academics Speaking About God"۔ JPararajasingham۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-05-14
  6. "Herbert Hauptman"۔ The Telegraph۔ 27 اکتوبر 2011۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ Outside the field of scientific research, he was known for his outspoken atheism: belief in God, he once declared, is not only incompatible with good science, but is "damaging to the wellbeing of the human race."
  7. Liberato Cardellini (اکتوبر 2007)۔ "Looking for Connections: An Interview with Roald Hoffmann" (PDF)۔ Journal of Chemical Education۔ ج 84 شمارہ 10: 1631–1635۔ DOI:10.1021/ed084p1631۔ ISSN:0021-9584۔ 2015-04-07 کو اصل (pdf) سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ atheist who is moved by religion.
  8. Harold W. Kroto (1996)۔ "Harold Kroto – Autobiography"۔ Nobelprize.org, The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-03-24۔ I am a devout atheist – nothing else makes any sense to me and I must admit to being bewildered by those, who in the face of what appears so obvious, still believe in a mystical creator.
  9. Ehsan Masood (22 جولائی 2006)۔ "Islam's reformers"۔ Prospect۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ It is a scene I won't forget in a hurry: Jean-Marie Lehn, French winner of the Nobel prize in chemistry, defending his atheism at a packed public conference at the new Alexandria Library in Egypt
  10. "Peter Mitchell – Biographical"۔ The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1978۔ Nobelprize.org۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15
  11. "Today, I consider myself, in Thomas Huxley's terms, an agnostic. I don’t know whether there is a God or creator, or whatever we may call a higher intelligence or being. I don’t know whether there is an ultimate reason for our being or whether there is anything beyond material phenomena. I may doubt these things as a scientist, as we cannot prove them scientifically, but at the same time we also cannot falsify (disprove) them. For the same reasons, I cannot deny God with certainty, which would make me an atheist. This is a conclusion reached by many scientists." George Olah, A Life of Magic Chemistry
  12. edited by Jürgen Kocka (2010)۔ Work in a Modern Society the German Experience in European-American Perspective.۔ New York: Berghahn Books, Inc.۔ ص 45۔ ISBN:978-1-84545-797-6 {{حوالہ کتاب}}: |first1= باسم عام (معاونت)
  13. ^ ا ب پ ت ٹ ث ج چ ح G. R. Pafumi۔ Is Our Vision of God Obsolete?: Often What We Believe Is Not What We Observe۔ 2010: Xlibris Corporation۔ ISBN:978-1-4500-0396-4{{حوالہ کتاب}}: اسلوب حوالہ 1 کا انتظام: مقام (link)
  14. ^ ا ب Linus Pauling؛ Daisaku Ikeda؛ Richard L. Gage (1992)۔ In quest of peace and the century of life : a dialogue between Linus Pauling and Daisaku Keda۔ Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers۔ ص 21–22۔ ISBN:978-0-86720-278-6
  15. "Max Perutz Interview 2"۔ The Vega Science Trust.۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2013-06-19
  16. "Perutz rubbishes Popper and Kuhn"۔ TSL EDUCATION LTD.۔ 28 نومبر 1994۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2013-06-19۔ Dr Perutz, said: "It is one thing for scientists to oppose creationism which is demonstrably false but quite another to make pronouncements which offend people's religious faith -- that is a form of tactlessness which merely brings science into disrepute. My view of religion and ethics is simple: even if we do not believe in God, we should try to live as though we did."
  17. István Hargittai؛ Magdolna Hargittai (2002)۔ Candid science II: conversations with famous biomedical scientists (Verschiedene Aufl. ایڈیشن)۔ London: Imperial College Press۔ ص 73–83۔ ISBN:1-86094-288-1
  18. Michael Smith (1993)۔ "Michael Smith – Biographical"۔ Nobelprize.org۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ My only prizes from the Sunday School were "for attendance"، so I presume my atheism, which developed when I left home to attend university, although latent, was discernible.
  19. Randy L. Wysong (1976)۔ The creation-evolution controversy. (7th print ایڈیشن)۔ Midlanding, Michigan: Inquiry Press۔ ص 75۔ ISBN:978-0-918112-02-6
  20. Lanny Ebenstein (2007)۔ Milton Friedman a biography (1st ایڈیشن)۔ New York: Palgrave Macmillan۔ ص 9۔ ISBN:978-0-230-60345-5
  21. Kenneth G. Elzinga؛ Matthew R. Givens (Spring 2009)۔ "Christianity and Hayek"۔ Faith & Economics شمارہ 53: 53–68
  22. Sylvia Nasar (2012)۔ A Beautiful Mind (Reprint ایڈیشن)۔ Faber & Faber۔ ص 64۔ ISBN:978-0-571-26607-4
  23. Judith S. Palfrey (2006)۔ Child health in America : making a difference through advocacy (Online-Ausg. ایڈیشن)۔ Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University۔ ص 123۔ ISBN:978-0-8018-8453-5
  24. Anthony Cronin (1999)۔ Samuel Beckett : the last modernist (1st Da Capo Press ایڈیشن)۔ New York: Da Capo Press۔ ص 90۔ ISBN:978-0-306-80898-2۔ They were both agnostics, though both set a high associative value on the language in which the traditional religions of their forebears had been expressed, and in conversation and writing were not averse to ironic reference to certain metaphysical concepts.
  25. Arthur C. Paulson (1930)۔ "Bjørnson and the Norwegian-Americans, 1880–81"۔ Studies and Records۔ Norwegian-American Historical Association۔ ج 5: 84–109۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15"آرکائیو کاپی"۔ 2016-03-05 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-12-26
  26. ^ ا ب پ ت Dan Barker (2011)۔ The good atheist : living a purpose-filled life without God۔ Berkeley, CA: Ulysses Press۔ ISBN:978-1-56975-846-5
  27. John Robert Maze (2010)۔ Albert Camus : plague and terror, priest and atheist۔ Bern: Peter Lang۔ ISBN:978-3-0343-0006-3
  28. Joseph Collins (Fall 2015)۔ "Anatole France"۔ VQR۔ ج 91 شمارہ 4۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15"آرکائیو کاپی"۔ 2012-12-16 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-12-26
  29. Ramesh Chopra (2005)۔ Academic Dictionary Of Philosophy۔ Gyan Books۔ ص 142۔ ISBN:9788182052246۔ His agnosticism is best seen in his 'Moods, Songs, and Doggerels'۔
  30. Nancy Topping Bazin، مدیر (1990)۔ Conversationwith Nadine Gordimer۔ London: University Press of Mississippi۔ ص 151۔ ISBN:978-0-87805-445-9
  31. Gao Xingjian (2000)۔ "Nobel Lecture – Literature 2000"۔ Nobelprize.org, The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-03-24۔ … I would like to say that despite my being an atheist I have always shown reverence for the unknowable.
  32. Adam Feinstein (2008)۔ Pablo neruda.۔ Bloomsbury Publishing USA۔ ص 36, 38, 97۔ ISBN:978-1-59691-781-1
  33. John Patrick Diggins (2007)۔ Eugene O'Neill's America desire under democracy۔ Chicago: University of Chicago Press۔ ص 130۔ ISBN:978-0-226-14882-3۔ O'Neill, an agnostic and an anarchist, maintained little hope in religion or politics and saw institutions not serving to preserve liberty but standing in the way of the birth of true freedom.
  34. Jean-Paul Sartre (1985)۔ Existentialism and human emotions (1st Carol Pub. Group ایڈیشن)۔ New York: Philosophical Library۔ ص 15۔ ISBN:978-0-8065-0902-0
  35. "Wole Soyinka"۔ Academy of Archievement۔ Washington D.C.۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2013-12-20
  36. Wole Soyinka (2007)۔ Climate of Fear: The Quest for Dignity in a Dehumanized World۔ Random House LLC۔ ص 119۔ ISBN:978-0-307-43082-3۔ I already had certain agnostic tendencies—which would later develop into outright atheistic convictions— so it was not that I believed in any kind of divine protection.
  37. Susan F. Beegel؛ Susan Shillinglaw؛ Wesley N. Tiffney, Jr. (2007)۔ Steinbeck and the Environment Interdisciplinary Approaches.۔ Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press۔ ص 159۔ ISBN:978-0-8173-5487-9
  38. Jackson J. Benson (1984)۔ The true adventures of John Steinbeck, writer: a biography۔ Viking Press۔ ص 248۔ ISBN:978-0-670-16685-5۔ Ricketts did not convert his friend to a religious point of view — Steinbeck remained an agnostic and, essentially, a materialist — but Ricketts's religious acceptance did tend to work on his friend, …
  39. Fernanda Eberstadt (18 جون 2010)۔ "José Saramago, Nobel Prize-Winning Portuguese Writer, Dies at 87"۔ نیو یارک ٹائمز۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15
  40. Martin Ceadel (2009)۔ Living the great illusion : Sir Norman Angell, 1872–1967۔ Oxford: Oxford University Press۔ ص 22۔ ISBN:978-0-19-957116-1
  41. Tom Behan (2000)۔ Dario Fo : revolutionary theatre۔ London: Pluto۔ ص 103۔ ISBN:978-0-7453-1362-7
  42. "Gorbachev a closet Christian?"۔ Chicago Tribune۔ 23 مارچ 2008۔ 2008-05-11 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا
  43. Gorelik, Gennady؛ Antonina W. Bouis (2005)۔ The World of Andrei Sakharov: A Russian Physicist's Path to Freedom۔ Oxford University Press۔ ص 356۔ ISBN:978-0-19-515620-1۔ Apparently Sakharov did not need to delve any deeper into it for a long time, remaining a totally nonmilitant atheist with an open heart.
  44. Gorelik, Gennadiĭ Efimovich؛ Antonina W. Bouis (2005)۔ The World of Andrei Sakharov: A Russian Physicist's Path to Freedom۔ Oxford University Press۔ ص 158۔ ISBN:978-0-19-515620-1۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-05-27۔ Sakharov was not invited to this seminar. Like most of the physicists of his generation, he was an atheist.
  45. Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford، مدیر (2012)۔ The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Violence, Homicide, and War۔ Oxford University Press۔ ص 465۔ ISBN:978-0-19-973840-3۔ The Soviet dissident most responsible for defeating communism, Andrei Sakharov, was an atheist.
  46. Elie Wiesel Wiesel (2010)۔ And the sea is never full memoirs 1969- (Unabridged ایڈیشن)۔ New York: Alfred Knopf۔ ص 318۔ ISBN:978-0-307-76409-6
  47. "Prominent Russians: Zhores Alferov"۔ RT.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-21۔ In public life the scientist is a strong supporter of communism, an atheist strongly objecting to advancement of religious education in Russia, and proponent of science and knowledge as the means to see a better future.
  48. "Zhores I. Alferov"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-21
  49. "Nuclear power is uniquely unforgiving: as Swedish Nobel physicist Hannes Alfvén said, "No acts of God can be permitted."" Amory Lovins, Inside NOVA – Nuclear After Japan: Amory Lovins، pbs.org۔
  50. Helge Kragh (2004)۔ Matter and Spirit in the Universe: Scientific and Religious Preludes to Modern Cosmology۔ OECD Publishing۔ ص 252۔ ISBN:978-1-86094-469-7۔ Alfven dismissed in his address religion as a "myth," and passionately criticized the big-bang theory for being dogmatic and violating basic standards of science, to be no less mythical than religion.
  51. ^ ا ب پ ت ٹ ث ج چ ح خ د ڈ ذ ر​ ڑ​ ز ژ س ش ص
  52. Philip W. Anderson (2011)۔ More and different notes from a thoughtful curmudgeon۔ Singapore: World Scientific۔ ص 177۔ ISBN:9789814350143۔ We atheists can ۔ ۔ ۔ argue that, with the modern revolution in attitudes toward homosexuals, we have become the only group that may not reveal itself in normal social discourse.
  53. Dennis Brian (2008)۔ The Voice of Genius: Conversations with Nobel Scientists and Other Luminaries۔ Basic Books۔ ص 117۔ ISBN:978-0-465-01139-1
  54. Mary Jo Nye (2008)۔ "Blackett, Patrick Maynard Stuart"۔ در Charles Coulston Gillispie (مدیر)۔ Complete dictionary of scientific biography۔ Detroit, Mich.: Charles Scribner's Sons۔ ج 19۔ ص 293۔ ISBN:978-0-684-31559-1۔ The grandson of a vicar on his father's side, Blackett respected religious observances that were established social customs, but described himself as agnostic or atheist.
  55. "50 Renowned Academics Speaking About God"۔ JPararajasingham۔ 2019-01-06 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-05-12
  56. John Simmons (2000)۔ "Niels Bohr and the atom 1885–1962"۔ The scientific 100 : a ranking of the most influential scientists, past and present۔ New York, N.Y.: Kensington Pub. Corp.۔ ص 16۔ ISBN:978-0-8065-2139-8۔ His mother was warm and intelligent, and his father, as Bohr himself later recalled, recognized "that something was expected of me." The family was not at all devout, and Bohr became an atheist.۔۔
  57. Richard Peterson (2010)۔ "The Copenhagen spirit of science and birth of the nuclear atom"۔ در Melville Y. Stewart (مدیر)۔ Science and religion in dialogue۔ Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell۔ ص 416۔ ISBN:978-1-4443-1736-7۔ ۔۔۔ after a youth of confirming faith Bohr himself was a non-believer.
  58. David Favrholdt (1994)۔ "Niels Bohr and realism"۔ در Jan Faye؛ Henry J. Folse (مدیران)۔ Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy۔ Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands۔ ص 88۔ ISBN:9789401581066۔ Planck was religious and had a firm belief in God; Bohr was not, but his objection to Planck's view had no anti-religious motive.
  59. "Percy Williams Bridgman"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-24۔ He was raised in the Congregational Church, but faith in God clashed with his well-known analytical nature and he told his family as a young man that he could not in good conscience become a church member.
  60. Maila L. Walter (1990)۔ Science and Cultural Crisis: An Intellectual Biography of Percy Williams Bridgman (1882–1961)۔ Stanford University Press۔ ص 14–15۔ ISBN:978-0-8047-1796-0۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-24۔ Raymond Bridgman was extremely disappointed with his son's rejection of his religious views. Near the end of his life, however, he offered a conciliatory interpretation that allowed him to accept Percy's commitment to honesty and integrity as a moral equivalent to religion.
  61. Ray Monk (2013)۔ Robert Oppenheimer: A Life Inside the Center۔ Random House LLC۔ ISBN:978-0-385-50413-3۔ In many ways they were opposites; Kemble, the theorist, was a devout Christian, while Bridgman, the experimentalist, was a strident atheist.
  62. Andrew Brown (1997)۔ The neutron and the bomb : a biography of Sir James Chadwick (1st ایڈیشن)۔ Oxford: Oxford University Press۔ ص 362۔ ISBN:978-0-19-853992-6۔ He was a lifelong atheist and felt no need to develop religious faith as he approached the end.۔۔
  63. C. V. Vishveshwara (اپریل 2000)۔ "Leaves from an unwritten diary: S. Chandrasekhar, Reminiscences and Reflections" (PDF)۔ Current Science۔ ج 78 شمارہ 8: 1025–1033۔ 2019-01-11 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا (PDF)۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-16۔ In his later years, Chandra had openly admitted to being an atheist which also meant that he subscribed to no religion in the customary sense of the word.
  64. Werner Heisenberg (1972)۔ Physics and beyond : encounters and conversations (1st Harper Torchbook ایڈیشن)۔ New York: Harper & Row۔ ISBN:0-06-131622-9۔ ۔۔۔ Dirac said: "I cannot understand why we idle discussing religion. If we are honest — and as scientists honesty is our precise duty — we cannot help but admit that any religion is a pack of false statements, deprived of any real foundation. The very idea of God is a product of human imagination.[…] I do not recognize any religious myth, at least because they contradict one another.[…]" Pauli jokingly said: "Well, I'd say that also our friend Dirac has got a religion and the first commandment of this religion is: God does not exist and Paul Dirac is his prophet."
  65. Helen Dukas؛ Banesh Hoffmann، مدیران (1989)۔ Albert Einstein, the human side : new glimpses from his archives۔ Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press۔ ص 43۔ ISBN:978-0-691-02368-7۔ It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
  66. ^ ا ب پ Alice Calaprice، مدیر (2000)۔ The expanded quotable Einstein (New ایڈیشن)۔ Princeton, NJ: مطبع جامعہ پرنسٹن۔ ISBN:978-0-691-07021-6
  67. Nancy K. Frankenberry (2008)۔ The faith of scientists in their own words۔ Princeton: مطبع جامعہ پرنسٹن۔ ص 153۔ ISBN:978-0-691-13487-1
  68. Richard P. Feynman (2011)۔ Ralph Leighton (مدیر)۔ "What Do You Care What Other People Think?": Further Adventures of a Curious Character۔ W. W. Norton & Company۔ ص 25۔ ISBN:978-0-393-07981-4۔ The elders began getting nervous, because I was an avowed atheist by that time
  69. "Val Fitch"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-07-18
  70. David Nachmansohn (1979)۔ German-Jewish pioneers in science, 1900–1933.۔ Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer۔ ص 62۔ ISBN:978-0-387-90402-3۔ As he said, science was his God and nature his religion. He did not insist that his daughters attend religious instruction classes (Religionsunterricht) in school. But he was very proud of his Jewish heritage.۔
  71. Brigham Narins (2001)۔ Notable Scientists from 1900 to the Present: D-H۔ Gale Group۔ ص 797۔ ISBN:978-0-7876-1753-0۔ Although Gabor's family became Lutherans in 1918, religion appeared to play a minor role in his life. He maintained his church affiliation through his adult years but characterized himself as a "benevolent agnostic"۔
  72. "The family adopted the Lutheran faith in 1918, and although Gabor nominally remained true to it, religion appears to have had little influence in his life. He later acknowledged the role played by an antireligious humanist education in the development of his ideas and stated his position as being that of a “benevolent agnostic.”" "Gabor, Dennis." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. 2008. Encyclopedia.com. (30 جنوری 2012)۔ [1]
  73. Herman Wouk (2010)۔ The language God talks on science and religion (1st ایڈیشن)۔ New York, NY: Little, Brown and Co.۔ ص 17۔ ISBN:978-0-316-09675-1
  74. Vitaly Ginzburg (2003)۔ "Vitaly L. Ginzburg – Autobiography"۔ Nobelprize.org, The Official Web Site of the نوبل انعام۔ 2019-01-06 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-03-24۔ I am an atheist, that is, I think nothing exists except and beyond nature. Within the limits of my, undoubtedly insufficient knowledge of the history of philosophy, I do not see in fact any difference between atheism and the pantheism of Spinoza.
  75. Ian Sample (17 نومبر 2007)۔ "The god of small things"۔ London: The Guardian۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2013-03-21۔ The name has stuck, but makes Higgs wince and raises the hackles of other theorists. "I wish he hadn't done it," he says. "I have to explain to people it was a joke. I'm an atheist, but I have an uneasy feeling that playing around with names like that could be unnecessarily offensive to people who are religious."
  76. "Gerardus `t Hooft – Science Video Interview"۔ 2004۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-25۔ When asked by the interviewer about his view of the universe and the design or non-design of the universe, Hooft replied, "Well absolutely amazing fact that it seems that the entire universe is now in grasp of theoretical physics. It still highly premature to make theories that includes how the big bang originated as and things like that. Although, people are tying that every day. ۔۔۔As far as I'm concerned, everything seems to behave completely rationally. The laws of physics is all we need to understand how the universe got into being. And then eventually we end up with this religious question as to why is the universe is the way it is and how can it be it is a place for humans to live in, that is a miracle. I don't have really any answers here, but as a physicist I've learn to appreciate the fact that everything seems to have totally rational explanations and as far as I'm concerned, I expect the entire universe now also to be something you can explain in completely rational terms. That what I expect now, just because of past experience."
  77. "Gerardus `t Hooft – Science Video Interview"۔ 2004۔ 2019-01-09 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-25۔ When asked by the interviewer about his belief in an afterlife, Hooft replied, "Well, such beliefs I think I related to religions of the past and I don't think that notions such as 'afterlife' has any.۔۔scientific basis. Not in terms of modern science. So I can only say no."
  78. Herbert Kroemer۔ "Herbert Kroemer – Science Video Interview"۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-12-26۔ Interviewer: "You have no belief in a afterlife?" Kroemer: "That's correct." Interviewer: "۔۔۔You don't see the evidence of a designer?" Kroemer: "No, I don't." Interviewer: "Could you say more about it?" Kroemer: "I think it's just wishful thinking."
  79. Henry F. Schaefer (2008)۔ Science and Christianity : conflict or coherence?۔ Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia۔ ص 9۔ ISBN:0-9742975-0-X۔ I present here two examples of notable atheists. The first is Lev Landau, the most brilliant Soviet physicist of the twentieth century.
  80. Dan Falk (2005)۔ "What About God?"۔ Universe on a T-Shirt: The Quest for the Theory of Everything۔ Arcade Publishing۔ ص 195۔ ISBN:978-1-55970-733-6۔ "Physics isn't a religion. If it were, we'd have a much easier time raising money." - Leon Lederman
  81. Babu Gogineni (10 جولائی 2012)۔ "It's the Atheist Particle, actually"۔ Postnoon News۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-07-10۔ Leon Lederman is himself an atheist and he regrets the term, and Peter Higgs who is an atheist too, has expressed his displeasure, but the damage has been done!
  82. John D. Barrow (2000)۔ The book of nothing : vacuums, voids, and the latest ideas about the origins of the universe (1st Vintage Books ایڈیشن)۔ New York: Vintage Books۔ ص 136۔ ISBN:978-0-375-72609-5
  83. Q&A: Russian Nobel Laureate on Fun, God and the 'Ideal Physicist'
  84. Bernard Valeur, Jean-Claude Brochon (2001)۔ New Trends in Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Applications to Chemical and Life Sciences۔ Springer۔ ص 17۔ ISBN:978-3-540-67779-6۔ Jean and Francis Perrin held similar political and philosophical ideas. Both were socialists and atheists. {{حوالہ کتاب}}: الوسيط |accessdate بحاجة لـ |مسار= (معاونت)
  85. Walter Moore (1994)۔ A life of Erwin Schrödinger۔ Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press۔ ص 86۔ ISBN:978-0-521-46934-0۔ Schopenhauer often called himself an atheist, as did Schrodinger, and if Buddhism and Vedanta can be truly described as atheistic religions, both the philosopher and his scientific disciple were indeed atheists. They both rejected the idea of a "personal God" …
  86. Andrea Diem-Lane (2008)۔ Spooky Physics: Einstein vs. Bohr۔ MSAC Philosophy Group۔ ص 68۔ ISBN:978-1-56543-080-8۔ In terms of religion, Schrodinger fits in the atheist camp. He even lost a marriage proposal to his love, Felicie Krauss, not only due to his social status but his lack of religious affiliation. He was known as a freethinker who did not believe in god.
  87. The International Academy of Humanism آرکائیو شدہ (Date missing) بذریعہ secularhumanism.org (Error: unknown archive URL) at the website of the Council for Secular Humanism. Retrieved 18 اکتوبر 2007. Some of this information is also at the International Humanist and Ethical Union آرکائیو شدہ (Date missing) بذریعہ iheu.org (Error: unknown archive URL) website
  88. Istva ́n Hargittai, Magdolna Hargittai (2006)۔ Candid Science VI: More Conversations with Famous Scientists۔ Imperial College Press۔ ص 749۔ ISBN:978-1-86094-885-5۔ Jack Steinberger: "I'm now a bit anti-Jewish since my last visit to the synagogue, but my atheism does not necessarily reject religion."
  89. Ginzburg, V. L. (2005)۔ About Science, Myself and Others۔ CRC Press۔ ص 253۔ ISBN:978-0-7503-0992-9۔ Nowadays, when we are facing manifestations of religious and. more often, pseudoreligious feelings, it is appropriate to mention that Igor Evgenevich was a convinced and unreserved atheist.
  90. Feinberg, E. L. and Leonidov, A. V. (2011)۔ Physicists: Epoch and Personalities (2 ایڈیشن)۔ World Scientific۔ ص 86۔ ISBN:9789812834164{{حوالہ کتاب}}: اسلوب حوالہ 1 کا انتظام: متعدد نام: مصنفین کی فہرست (link)
  91. Ana Elena Azpurua (24 مارچ 2008)۔ "In Search of the God Particle"۔ Newsweek۔ ص 3۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2008-03-25۔ I don't believe in God, but I don't make a religion out of not believing in God. I don't organize my life around that.
  92. Jesse Hong Xiong (2009)۔ "Seven"۔ The Outline of Parapsychology۔ Rowman & Littlefield۔ ص 322۔ ISBN:978-0-7618-4945-2۔ When a reporter asked him: "Do you believe there is a Creator who creates all in the universe?" Professor Chen Ning Yang (1922- )، a Chinese Nobel Prize winner in physics in 1957, answered: "I think it is hard for me to directly say 'yes' or 'no'۔ I can only say that when we more and more understand the wonderful structures in the nature, no matter whether we directly or indirectly ask the question, there does exist the question you ask: is there someone or God who takes charge of all? I think it is a question that will never be finally answered. (The reporter asked: 'Is it because what man knows is too limited?') On one hand, yes; on the other hand, we can have a feeling that the universe will not be created so wonderful without an ultimate goal." Professor Yang held agnosticism here.
  93. Carl F Craver (2008)۔ "Axelrod, Julius"۔ Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography۔ Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons۔ ج 19۔ ص 122۔ Although he became an atheist early in life and resented the strict upbringing of his parents' religion, he identified with Jewish culture and joined several international fights against anti-Semitism.
  94. Robert W. Baloh۔ "Robert Bárány and the controversy surrounding his discovery of the caloric reaction"۔ Neurology.org۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-05-14۔ Although anti-Semitism was again on the rise in Austria, it is unlikely that anti-Semitism was a factor in the hostility toward Bárány because he was an agnostic who did not believe in Zionism.
  95. "J. Michael Bishop"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-07-18
  96. Francis Crick (1988)۔ What mad pursuit : a personal view of scientific discovery۔ New York: Basic Books۔ ص 10۔ ISBN:0-465-09138-5
  97. Francis Crick (3–5 فروری 1990)۔ "How I Got Inclined Towards Atheism"۔ Atheist Centre 1940–1990 Golden Jubilee International Conference Souvenir۔ Vijayawada, India: Positive Atheism۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15
  98. Mark Steyn (اکتوبر 2004)۔ "The Twentieth-Century Darwin"۔ The Atlantic Monthly۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-12-26
  99. Ralph M. Siegel؛ Edward M. Callaway (2004)۔ "Francis Crick's Legacy for Neuroscience: Between the α and the Ω"۔ PLoS Biology۔ ج 2 شمارہ 12: e419۔ DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020419۔ Francis Crick was an evangelical atheist.{{حوالہ رسالہ}}: اسلوب حوالہ 1 کا انتظام: غیر نشان زد مفت ڈی او آئی (link)
  100. Roger Highfield (20 مارچ 2003)۔ "Do our genes reveal the hand of God?"۔ The Telegraph۔ 2019-01-06 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ Crick, 86, said: "The god hypothesis is rather discredited."
  101. "Max Delbrück"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-05-14
  102. Walter Shropshire (2007)۔ Max Delbrück and the New Perception of Biology, 1906–1981: A Centenary Celebration, University of Salamanca, اکتوبر 9–10, 2006۔ AuthorHouse۔ ص 155۔ ISBN:978-1-4343-1435-2۔ As far as I know, he never identified himself as a member of any formal church or religious faith, but neither did he reject religion. He had a deeply felt respect for all faiths, believing that regardless of the details, they all fill basically the same human aspirations.
  103. Michael Ruse۔ "Life Evolving: Molecules, Mind, and Meaning by Christian de Duve (Introductory essay)"۔ The International Society for Science and Religion library project۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15
  104. Trevor Illtyd Williams (1984)۔ Howard Florey, Penicillin and After۔ Oxford University Press۔ ص 363۔ ISBN:978-0-19-858173-4۔ As an agnostic, the chapel services meant nothing to Florey but, unlike some contemporary scientists, he was not aggressive in his disbelief.
  105. Paolo Mazzarello, Henry A. Buchtel, Aldo Badiani (1999)۔ The hidden structure: a scientific biography of Camillo Golgi۔ Oxford University Press۔ ص 34۔ ISBN:978-0-19-852444-1۔ It was probably during this period that Golgi became agnostic (or even frankly atheistic)، remaining for the rest of his life completely alien to the religious experience.{{حوالہ کتاب}}: اسلوب حوالہ 1 کا انتظام: متعدد نام: مصنفین کی فہرست (link)
  106. "Frederick Hopkins"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-07-18
  107. "Obituary: Andrew Huxley"۔ The Economist۔ 16 جون 2012۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2013-05-14۔ He did not even mind the master's duty of officiating in chapel, since he was, he explained, not atheist but agnostic (a word usefully invented by his grandfather)، and was "very conscious that there is no scientific explanation for the fact that we are conscious."
  108. Peter Medawar (1996)۔ The strange case of the spotted mice and other classic essays on science (5th ایڈیشن)۔ Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press۔ ص 207–211۔ ISBN:978-0-19-286193-1
  109. Richard Lubbock۔ "Peaks, Dust, & Dappled Spots"۔ Books in Canada: The Canadian Review of Books۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ In his final chapter de Duve turns to the meaning of life, and considers the ideas of two contrasting Frenchmen: a priest, Teilhard de Chardin, and an existentialist and atheist, Jacques Monod.
  110. Norman H. Horowitz (اگست 1998)۔ "T. H. Morgan at Caltech: A Reminiscence"۔ Genetics۔ ج 149: 1629–1632۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ Morgan's passion for experimentation was symptomatic of his general scepticism and his distaste for speculation. He believed only what could be proven. He was said to be an atheist, and I have always believed that he was. Everything I knew about him—his scepticism, his honesty—was consistent with disbelief in the supernatural.
  111. G. Pontecorvo (نومبر 1968)۔ "Hermann Joseph Muller. 1890–1967"۔ Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society۔ Quote from p. 353۔ ج 14: 348–389۔ DOI:10.1098/rsbm.1968.0015۔ JSTOR:769450۔ Muller, who through Unitarianism had become an enthusiastic pantheist, was converted both to atheism and to socialism.
  112. Alfred I. Tauber؛ Leon Chernyak (1991)۔ Metchnikoff and the Origins of Immunology : From Metaphor to Theory: From Metaphor to Theory۔ Oxford University Press۔ ص 5۔ ISBN:978-0-19-534510-0۔ ۔۔۔ his personal religious commitment was to atheism, although he received strict Christian religious training at home. Metchnikoff's atheism smacked of religious fervor in the embrace of rationalism and science.
  113. Costantino Ceoldo (31 دسمبر 2012)۔ "Homage to Rita Levi Montalcini"۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2013-07-20۔ Born and raised in a Sephardic Jewish family in which culture and love of learning were categorical imperatives, she abandoned religion and embraced atheism.
  114. Paul Nurse (2001)۔ "Sir Paul Nurse – Biographical"۔ Nobelprize.org۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15۔ I gradually slipped away from religion over several years and became an atheist or to be more philosophically correct, a sceptical agnostic.
  115. George Windholz (ستمبر 1986)۔ "Pavlov's Religious Orientation"۔ Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion۔ ج 25 شمارہ 3: 320۔ DOI:10.2307/1386296۔ Pavlov's follower E.M. Kreps asked him whether he was religious. Kreps writes that Pavlov smiled and replied: "Listen, good fellow, in regard to [claims of] my religiosity, my belief in God, my church attendance, there is no truth in it; it is sheer fantasy. I was a seminarian, and like the majority of seminarians, I became an unbeliever, an atheist in my school years."
  116. William Reville (20 اپریل 2006)۔ "A bright journey to atheism, or a road that ignores all the signs?"۔ The Irish Times۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15
  117. "John E. Sulston"۔ NNDB۔ Soylent Communications۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2014-04-21
  118. "Adofo Pérez Esquivel"۔ Nobel Prize Committee۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-12-26
  119. "Albert Szent-Györgyi"۔ NNDB.com۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-07-18
  120. Deirdre Barrett (2010)۔ Supernormal Stimuli: How Primal Urges Overran Their Evolutionary Purpose۔ W. W. Norton & Company۔ ص 21–22۔ ISBN:978-0-393-06848-1۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2012-04-25۔ Tinbergen had never been a religious man. Wartime atrocities, however, had highlighted the absence of a deity for him while both sides invoked one aligned with themselves, and this turned him into a militant atheist.
  121. Roger Highfield (20 مارچ 2003)۔ "Do our genes reveal the hand of God?"۔ The Telegraph۔ 2018-12-26 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2015-10-15

بیرونی ربط

ترمیم